Heena Maru And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra

P.H. Jayani 929 IAST16505.2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2995 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 746 OF 2021 Ms. Heena Maru and anr.

.... Applicants v/s.

The State of Maharashtra .... Respondent Mr. Akash Singh i/b. Mr. Ashok M. Saraogi for the Applicants. Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the State.

CORAM: SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.

DATED : 27th APRIL, 2022.

P. C. :- .

By this Application, the Applicants have sought extension of time to furnish surety.

2.

The Applicants were released on bail by order dated 03/05/2021. They were permitted to furnish cash surety with further directions to furnish surety within a period of eight weeks. 3.

Learned counsel for the Applicants states that the surety will be furnished within a period of one week. In view of the said statement, time to furnish surety is extended by one week. It is made clear that failure to furnish surety within the stipulated time will result in 1/2

P.H. Jayani 929 IAST16505.2021.doc cancellation of bail without further reference to this Court. 4.

Application stands disposed of.

PREETI H JAYANI (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) by PREETI H JAYANI Date: 2022.04.29 15:44:31 +0530 2/2