← Library
Bombay High CourtALP/412/2015other disposed off

Vivek Anant Parve v. Shekhar S. Sumant And ANR

2016-02-08Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Thipsay2 pages

4-ALP-408-409-412-413-414-416-2015.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.408 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.409 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.412 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.413 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.414 OF 2015 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.416 OF 2015 VIVEK ANANT PARVE )...APPLICANT V/s.

SHEKHAR S. SUMANT AND ORS.

)...RESPONDENTS Shri Vilas Tapkir, Advocate for the Applicant. None for the Respondents.

Shri V.B.KondeDeshmukh, APP for the Respondent - State.

CORAM

:

ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.

DATE :

8th FEBRUARY 2016.

avk 1/2

4-ALP-408-409-412-413-414-416-2015.doc P.C. :

I have heard the Shri Vilas Tapkir, the learned counsel for the applicant. The applicant had made some other applications seeking leave, in which applications, leave has just now been refused by me (Criminal Application Nos.410/2015, 411/2015, 415/2015, 417/2015 and 418/2015). It is conceded that the same reasoning applies to the present cases also. In substance, it may be stated that, since there does exist a reasonable doubt about the truth of the matter; and since it would not be possible to uphold the order of acquittal, in the ultimate analysis, grant of leave would be futile. Leave refused.

The applications are rejected.

(ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.) avk 2/2