Shri Girish Vinodchandra Dhruva And ORS v. Smt. Neena Paresh Shah

P.H. Jayani 02 FA1252.2023.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO. 1252 OF 2013 Girish Vinodchandra Dhruva and ors.

.... Appellants v/s.

Smt. Neena Paresh Shah and anr.

.... Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3479 OF 2013 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1252 OF 2013 Girish Vinodchandra Dhruva and ors.

.... Appellants v/s.

Smt. Neena Paresh Shah and anr.

.... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3007 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1252 OF 2013 Smt. Neena Paresh Shah and anr.

.... Appellants v/s.

Girish Vinodchandra Dhruva and ors.

.... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 18033 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1252 OF 2013 Girish Vinodchandra Dhruva and ors.

.... Appellants v/s.

Smt. Neena Paresh Shah and anr.

.... Respondents Mr. Mayur Khandeparkar a/w. Mr. Sanket Mungale for the Appellants.

Mr. Kevic Setalvad, senior Advocate with Vatsal Shah, Mr. Chetan Mehta, Ms Vidhi Shah i/b. M/s. M.M.K. Law 1/2

P.H. Jayani 02 FA1252.2023.doc Associates for the Respondents in FA/1252/2013 and for the Applicants in IA/3007/2022.

CORAM: SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.

DATED : 12/06/2023.

P.C. :- .

Though the judgment is passed after six months, learned counsel for both the parties has stated that it should not be treated as de partheard and have consented for pronouncement of judgment. (SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) 2/2