Anil Nanasaheb Jagtap v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

1 WP 8441-13.doc-21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8441 OF 2013 Anil Nanasaheb Jagtap.

] ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

] ... Respondents Mr. Milind Deshmukh for Petitioner.

Ms. N. M. Mehra, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Akshay Kapadia i/b M/s. J. Shekhar & Co. for Respondent No.4. CORAM :- R. M. SAVANT & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE :- 06 OCTOBER, 2017 P. C. :- The learned Counsel for the respondent no.4 Mr. Kapadia states that elections to the respondent no.4 were held in the year 2016. Mr. Deshmukh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, does not dispute the said position. In view thereof, the grievance of the petitioner in respect of the elections being not held is assuaged. Hence the petition is turned infructuous. The petition is accordingly disposed of as having turned infructuous.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (R. M. SAVANT, J.) URS