Arjun Sobhraj Kalro v. Kishor Amratlal Karia And ANR.

1. Apeal 934 of 2006.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 934 OF 2006 Arjun Sobhraj Kalro ...Appellant vs.

Kishor Amratlal Kariya and Anr.

...Respondents

ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 933 OF 2006 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 935 OF 2006 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 936 OF 2006 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 938 OF 2006 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 939 OF 2006 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 940 OF 2006 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1092 OF 2006 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1093 OF 2006 ALONGWITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1094 OF 2006 ***** Ms. Vaishnavi M. Gujarathi i/by Adv. Rajeev S. Matkar - Advocate for the Appellant Mr. H. J. Dedhia - APP for the Respondent-State None for Respondent No. 1.

***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

08th JUNE, 2023 P. C. :- Seema 1/2

1. Apeal 934 of 2006.doc 1.

The Appellant-Arjun has expired and earlier, time was granted to his learned Advocate to take instructions from the Legal Representatives. Today, learned Advocate has got instructions that they do not want to prosecute the present Appeal that is Criminal Appeal No. 934 of 2006. The said written instructions is taken on record and marked as '

Annexure-X'

.

2.

In view of that, Appeal No. 934 of 2006 is disposed of. 3.

It is submitted that apart from this appeal, there are other appeals also. Their numbers are mentioned in the instructions filed today. They are not on board and taken on board. The Legal Representatives do not want to prosecute those appeals also and hence all above mentioned appeals are disposed of. [S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 2/2