Sunanda Chandrakant Satam v. The State Of Maharashtra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2574 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 14858 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2574 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2643 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2574 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2431 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2574 OF 2005 Sunanda Chandrakant Satam Petitioners V/s.

The State Of Maharashtra Respondents WRIT PETITION NO. 2496 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 14856 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2596 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2642 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2496 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2434 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2496 OF 2005 Smita S. Redkar Petitioners V/s.

State Govt. Of Maharashtra And Ors.

Respondents Kiran Kawre 1/3

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2128 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1794 OF 2006 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2128 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST)NO. 14855 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2128 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2641 OF 2010 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2128 OF 2005 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2433 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2128 OF 2005 Snehalata C. Sansare Petitioners V/s.

State Govt. Of Maharashtra And Ors.

Respondents ----- None for the Petitioner.

Mr. P. P. Kakde, G. P. a/w Mr. P. P. Pujari, AGP for the Respondent/State. ----- C0RAM : G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.

DATE : FEBRUARY 05, 2024 PC :

1.

Learned Government Pleader, Appellate Side had circulated with the Kiran Kawre 2/3

Registry a list of old infructuous matters so that these matters could be listed and disposed of as infructuous. These petitions are also in the list. This list of infructuous matters was notified by the office by its notice dated 25 January 2024, by which the parties/advocates were intimated that if the proceedings have not become infructuous, then a praecipe be submitted in the office before its listing stating that the matter needs to be adjudicated. Accordingly, after such prior notice, these matters are listed today before this Court. No praecipe has been received on behalf of the petitioners or the advocate for the petitioners stating that something would survive for adjudication in these petitions.

Even when these petitions were called out, none appears for the petitioners. It, therefore, appears that the petitioners are not interested to prosecute these petitions and/or they have become infructuous. These petitions are, accordingly, disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioners to revive these petitions, in the event, the petitioners feels that the cause of action still survive.

4.

Disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

5.

Civil Application, if any, also stands disposed of. (FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.) Kiran Kawre 3/3