← Library
Bombay High CourtCAN/89/2018

Telap Shantaram Gangaram And ORS. v. Deputy Collector (Evi/Enc) And ORS.

2018-12-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajesh G. Ketkar2 pages

CAN89_18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.89 OF 2018 IN CONTEMPT PETITION (ST.) NO.32846 OF 2017 (REJECTED CASE NO.1370 OF 2018) Telap Shantaram Gangaram and others ...

Petitioners Vs.

Deputy Collector (Evi/Enc) and others ...

Respondents Mr. D. K. Chavan for Petitioners.

Mr. S. H. Kankal, AGP for Respondents-State.

Mr. Bipin Joshi for Respondent No.3.

CORAM : R. G. KETKAR, J.

DATE :

DECEMBER 4, 2018 P.C. :

Not on Board. At the request of Mr. Chavan, taken up in the production Board.

2.

Heard Mr. Chavan, learned Counsel for petitioners, Mr. Kankal, learned AGP for respondents-State and Mr. Joshi, learned Counsel for respondent No.3.

3.

This is an application for setting aside order dated 19.04.2018 after condoning the delay of 85 days in filing the application. By order dated 19.04.2018 passed by the Registrar (Judicial-II), 4 weeks time was granted to the petitioner for removing office objections, failing which registration stamp was to stand refused.

4.

Mr. Chavan assures that after restoration of the Petition, within 2 weeks, he will remove office objections.

5.

In view thereof and for the reasons stated in the application, Civil 1/2

CAN89_18.doc Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b) with no order as to costs. Contempt Petition is restored to its original position. Applicant shall remove office objections, failing which, order dated 19.04.2018 shall stand revived without further reference to the Court. Civil Application is disposed of.

(R. G. KETKAR, J.) Minal Parab 2/2