Rahul Ranjan Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra

Mhi 1 ABA-1560-16.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1560 OF 2016 Mr. Rahul Ranjan Patil ...

Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent Mr. Sabir Sarkar, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Sangeeta Rokadefor orig. complainant.

Ms. Veera Shinde,APP, for the State.

P.I. Vijay Waghmare (I.O.) Khabndeshwar Police Station, Navi Mumbai, present.

CORAM:

SMT.SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.

DATE : 2nd December, 2016.

P.C.

Heard. Respective counsel have submitted that the complainant and the accused i.e. the present applicant have arrived at an amicable settlement vide a notarized document dated 18.11.2016. The copy of the settlement is taken on record and marked as "X' for the purpose of identification.

2.

Taking into consideration the fact that parties have arrived at an amicable settlement during the pendency of the Anticipatory Bail

Mhi 2 ABA-1560-16.sxw Application, the interim relief granted vie order dated 7.9.2016 deserves to be confirmed on the same terms and conditions. 3.

Application stands disposed of in the above terms. (SMT. SADHANA S.JADHAV, J.)