Ravi Arun Waghmare v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

Shubhada S Kadam 32-ba-2816-2022.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2816 of 2022 Ravi Arun Waghmare .... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and anr.

.... Respondents Ms. Rui Danawala along with Mr. Ibrahim Shaikh i/b. Mr. Ashraf Ali Akhtar Shaikh, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. Amit A. Palkar, APP for Respondent No.1-State. Ms. Dhruti Kapadia, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 11th OCTOBER, 2023.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for applicant, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and learned APP.

2.

Learned counsel for applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application. Considering her request, application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed off.

3.

Learned counsel for applicant submitted that applicant is behind bar for more than 3 years, yet charge has not been framed, hence, direction be given to the Trial Court to expedite the trial. Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2023.10.13 11:04:31 +0530 1/2 SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM

Shubhada S Kadam 32-ba-2816-2022.doc 4.

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for applicant, Trial Court is requested to frame the charge against applicant as expeditiously as possible and expedite the trial. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) 2/2