Aman Pradhan Rathod And ANR. v. State Of Maharashtra
902_ABA2511_22.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2511 OF 2022
1. Aman Pradhan Rathod
2. Aditya Pradhan Rathod ...
Applicants Vs.
State of Maharashtra ...
Respondent AND ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2513 OF 2022
1. Topa Dhanu Chavan
2. Pradhan Rama Rathod ...
Applicants Vs.
State of Maharashtra ...
Respondent Mr. Ritesh Thobde a/w. Mr. Sagar Tambe for Applicants. Mr. N. B. Patil, APP for Respondent-State.
Mr. Netaji Sukhdev Bandgar, Solapur Taluka Police Station. CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE :
SEPTEMBER 14, 2022 P.C. :
Applicants are seeking pre-arrest bail in Crime No.548 of 2022 registered with Solapur Police Station, Solapur (Rural) for the offences punishable under Sections 353, 333, 225, 147, 143, 149, 504, 506 and 109 of the IPC.
2.
On instructions, counsel for the applicant does not press both these applications but for the accused applicant Pradhan Rama Rathod in Anticipatory Bail Application No.2513 of 2022. 3.
APP would oppose the prayer on the ground that the said applicant's name is reflected in the FIR and he had tried to assault the public servant with the other co-accused.
4.
It appears from the record that though the said accused namely, Pradhan Rama Rathod is named in the FIR, there is no role or any overt act attributed to him in the matter of assault to the public servant. It also appears that he was only a part of the group. 1/2
902_ABA2511_22.doc 5.
That being so, in the event of arrest of the applicant - Pradhan Rama Rathod in Crime No.548 of 2022 registered with Solapur Police Station, Solapur (Rural) for the offences punishable under Sections 353, 333, 225, 147, 143, 149, 504, 506 and 109 of the IPC, he be released on bail on executing P.R. Bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one or two sureties in the like amount. Applicant shall attend the Investigating Officer from 23rd to 29th September, 2022 between 10:00 a.m. and 12 noon and thereafter as and when directed by the Investigating Officer. The said applicant shall not directly or indirectly try to influence the prosecution witnesses and tamper with the evidence. 6.
Both the Applications are disposed of accordingly. (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) Minal Parab 2/2