Ms. Ramandeep Sandhu v. Mah. University Of Health Sciences Mhasrul And ANR.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.2335 OF 2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.873 OF 2015 P. A. Inamdar and others ..Petitioners/Applicants

Versus

State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.1106 OF 2014 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.876 OF 2015 P. A. Inamdar and others ..Petitioners/Applicants

Versus

State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.3852 OF 2014 Jamia Islamia Ishaatul Uloom and another ..Petitioners

Versus

State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.5450 OF 2014 Shaan Education Society's Guardian College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre ..Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.6389 OF 2014 BGP. 1 of 3

Maharashtra Medical Education And Research Centre and another ..Petitioners

Versus

State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.6390 OF 2014 The Association of Muslim Minority's Medical Educational of Maharashtra ..Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents AND WRIT PETITION NO.9865 OF 2018 Ms. Ramandeep Sandhu ..Petitioner

Versus

Mah. University of Health Sciences Mhasrul and another ..Respondents Mr. S. N. Biradar I/by Mr. V. B. Devkhile and Mr. A. S. Gaikwad, Advocate for the Petitioners in WP Nos.2335 of 2014, 1106 of 2014, 3852 of 2014, 5450 of 2014, 6389 of 2014, 6390 of 2014 and CAW Nos.873 of 2015 & 876 of 2015.

Mr. Nigel Qureishy I/by Mr. Dushyant H. Krishnan, Advocate for the Petitioner in WP No.9865 of 2018.

Mr. V. M. Mali, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 in WP Nos.2335 of 2014 & 1106 of 2014.

Mr. A. I. Patel, Addl. GP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 in WP No.6389 of 2014.

Ms. Kavita N. Solunke, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 in WP No.3852 of 2014, 5450 of 2014, 6390 of 2014, 9865 of 2018. BGP. 2 of 3

Mr. S. S. Patwardhan, Advocate for Respondent No.3 in all the Petitions.

CORAM : B. R. GAVAI & M. S. KARNIK, JJ.

DATE : 12th OCTOBER, 2018 P.C.

1] The facts and questions of law in the present Petitions are identical with the facts and questions which arose for consideration in Writ Petition No.7377 of 2014. This Court by reasoned judgment and order has allowed the said Petition. For the reasons stated while allowing the said Petition, the present Petitions also deserve to be allowed.

2] In view of disposal of Writ Petitions, Civil Applications do not survive and accordingly stand disposed of. [M. S. KARNIK, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.] BGP. 3 of 3