Madhav Balaji Dangare v. The State Of Maharashtra

Sherla V.

wp.3178.2016_8.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3178 OF 2016 Madhav Balaji Dangare ... Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Ms.Rohini Dandekar, advocate appointed for the Petitioner Mr.Arfan Sait, APP, for Respondent - State CORAM: SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI & MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.

DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 2016 ORAL ORDER (PER SMT.V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.):

1.

The petitioner preferred an application for parole on 4.5.2015. The said application came to be rejected by order Dated 22.6.2015. Being aggrieved thereby, the petitioner preferred appeal. The said appeal was dismissed, hence this petition.

2.

The application of the petitioner for parole came to be rejected because the petitioner stated that Shri Rajesh Kushan Landge (Bhoi), who was residing at Swami Samarth housing society, Flat No.7, Niphad, Nasik, was to stand as surety for him. However, the police made enquiries about Shri Rajesh Kushan Landge and it was found that no person of such name was residing in the village and nobody from the village knew him or where 1 / 2

wp.3178.2016_8.doc he resided. No information about such person could be gathered. This was one of the main reasons for rejecting the application of the petitioner for parole. In this view of the matter, if the petitioner furnishes a suitable and competent surety, the application of the petitioner for parole be considered afresh.

3.

Rule is made absolute in the above terms.

4.

Office to communicate this order to the petitioner, who is in Nashik Road Central Prison, Nashik.

(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.) (V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J.) 2 / 2