← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/1868/2016others disposed off

Sanjay Sripath Sukam v. The State Of Maharashtra

2017-03-07Hon'Ble Smt. Justice S.S. Jadhav2 pages

12.ba1868.16.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1868 OF 2016 Sanjay Sripath Sukam.

... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

--- Ms. Supriya Kak, advocate for Applicant.

Ms. Veera Shinde, APP for State.

--- CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J DATE : MARCH 7, 2017 P.C.:

Learned APP upon instructions submits that the applicant has criminal antecedents in as much as 13 offences are registered against the applicant and in the present case, he is charged with an offence punishable under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code. In view of this, it would not appropriate to consider the application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The application stands dismissed.

Talwalkar 1/2

12.ba1868.16.sxw The learned advocate appointed for the applicant has put in the best of the efforts to espouse the cause of the applicant. The professional fees is quantified at Rs. 1,000/- to be paid to the learned advocate appointed within 3 months.

Office to communicate this order to the applicant who is in jail forthwith.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) Talwalkar 2/2