Anant Jeevan Patil v. State Of Maharashtra

(23)ABA-2529-2022.doc rajshree

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.2529 OF 2022 Anant Jeevan Patil ] ..

Applicant vs.

State of Maharashtra ] ..

Respondent Ms.Vaishali Raje for the Applicant.

Mr.S.V. Gavand, APP for the State.

API Sandeep Kahale, Saphale Police Station present. CORAM :

BHARATI DANGRE, J DATE :

12th OCTOBER, 2022.

P.C.

1] The Applicant was directed to report to the Investigating Officer, so as to demonstrate the expenditure of Rs.26,50,000/- towards development, as on earlier date he had satisfied the Investigating Officer about payment of Rs.53,50,000/- which was incurred towards settling the occupiers.

2] The learned APP on instructions of the Investigating Officer API Sandeep Kahale state that, he is satisfied with the explanation offered by the Applicant whose case is that he has received amount of Rs.91 Lakh which was bifurcated under two distinct heads, as it was supported by the relevant material. The statement is made that custodial interrogation is not necessary.

1/2

(23)ABA-2529-2022.doc 3] In the wake of above, order dated 14.09.2022 is made absolute. 4] Needless to state that the applicant shall continue to co-operate in the investigation and report to the Investigating Officer, as and when called, for the purpose of investigation.

[BHARATI DANGRE, J] 2/2