Indrayani Rajan Patani v. The State Of Mahrashtra

901-wp-3664-2018.doc Shailaja

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3664 OF 2018 Indrayani Rajan Patani ] Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ] Respondent .....

Mr. Lakshyaved R. Odhekar, for Petitioner.

Mr. Y.M. Nakhwa, A.P.P, for Respondent-State. .....

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.J.

DATE : 23rd DECEMBER, 2022.

P.C.

1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions of the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the petition. He submits that during the pendency of the petition, charge-sheet has been filed and as such, the petitioner intends to approach the trial Court by filing a discharge application.

2.

Petition is accordingly disposed of, as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.

SHAILAJA SHRIKANT HALKUDE SHRIKANT HALKUDE Date: 2022.12.26 15:41:33 +0530

901-wp-3664-2018.doc 3.

If an application for discharge is filed, learned trial Court to decide the said application, on it's own merits, in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the withdrawal of this petition. 4.

We make it clear that we have not heard the petition on merits, hence, all contentions of all the parties on merits are kept open.

[PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J.] [REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.]