Ambethan Village Panchayat Through Its Sarpanch v. Kashinath Sakharam Mahalunkar And ORS.

sat caw 1831-2018.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1831 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 10536 OF 2017 Ambethan Village Panchayat ...Applicant In the matter between Kashinath Sakharam Mahalunkar & Anr.

...Petitioners

Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...Respondents

Mr.S.S. Patwardhan for Applicant.

Mr.Siddesh Pilankar i/b. U.P. Warunjikar for Petitioners. Mr.Nitin Deshpande i/b. Ravi G. Shinde for Respondent No.4. Mr.P.G. Sawant, AGP for State.

CORAM : A.A. SAYED & S.C. GUPTE, JJ.

DATED : 24 AUGUST 2018 P.C. :

The civil application is not on board. Taken on board. The civil application is filed by the ApplicantAmbethan Village Panchayat seeking to be impleaded as party Respondent No.5. The Applicant's grievance is that on account of pendency of the petition, the work of widening of MDR - 18 is affected and thereby serious prejudice is caused to the villagers of Ambethan Village Panchayat and the entire population around. For the reasons stated in the civil application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (A) and (B). Amendment to be carried out by the Petitioners within one week. 1 / 2

sat caw 1831-2018.doc Let the affidavit in reply be filed before the next date with an advance copy to the other side.

S.O. to 14 September 2018.

(S.C. GUPTE, J.) (A.A. SAYED, J.) 2 / 2