Sameer D. Wankhede v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

501-wp-4036-21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4036 OF 2021 Sameer D. Wankhede ..Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..Respondents __________ Mr. Atul Nanda, Senior Advocate a/w. Sujay Kantawala a/w. Rameeza Hakeem a/w. Ishan Srivastava, Sujit Sahoo and Aditya Talpade for Petitioner.

Ms. A. S. Pai, P.P. for State/Respondent No.1. Mr. D. P. Singh, for Respondent Nos.2 and 3.

__________ CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 28 OCTOBER 2021 P.C. :

.

Not on board. Mentioned by way of praecipe. Taken on production board at 2:30 p.m..

2.

Heard Shri Atul Nanda, the learned Senior Counsel for the Petitioner, Smt A. S. Pai, the learned Public Prosecutor for Respondent No.1 and Shri D. P. Singh, the learned counsel for Respondents Nos.2 and 3.

Gokhale

501-wp-4036-21 3.

It is not necessary to go deeper in the controversy in view of the statement made by the learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, that before taking any coercive steps against the Petitioner such as arrest, three working days notice will be given to the Petitioner.

4.

The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that this statement made by the learned Public Prosecutor will suffice for purpose of the Petitioner for this petition.

5.

The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly accepting the statement made by the learned Public Prosecutor on instructions. VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE 6.

Needless to state, we have not commented on the merits VINOD BHASKAR GOKHALE Date: 2021.10.28 19:36:43 +0530 of rival contentions in the Petition.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)