← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/1666/2018others disposed off

Bhimrao Dattatray Bodke v. The State Of Maharashtra

2019-06-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal2 pages

1 911-ABA No.1539-18 and Others.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1539 OF 2018 Kishore Dilip Patil ] ... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1600 OF 2018 Raghunath Santu Bunge And Ors.

] ... Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1618 OF 2018 Ramdas Santu Bunage ] ... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.1666 OF 2018 Bhimrao Dattatray Bodke ] ... Applicant Purti Parab

2 911-ABA No.1539-18 and Others.doc

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ] ... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Shinde, Advocate for the Applicant in ABA No.1539/2018. Mr. Aniket Nikam i/b Mr. Aashish Satpute, Advocate for the Applicant in ABA No.1600/2018 and ABA No.1618/2018.

Mr. Nitin Sejpal, Advocate for the Applicant in ABA No.1666/2018. Mr. Rajan Salvi, APP for the State/Respondent. PSI Prakash Patil attached to Dindori Police Station (NR) present. CORAM :- SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE :- 26 JUNE, 2019.

P. C. :- 1.

In all these applications, the Investigating Officer is present. On his instructions, Ld. APP makes a categorical statement that the investigating agency does not want to arrest any of the applicants. The statement is accepted and since there is no apprehension of arrest, all these applications are disposed of as infructuous. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Purti Parab