Mrs. Jyoti Sunil Parmar And ANR v. Mr. Sunil Samuel Parmar

bsb 1 19.MCAst.25351.15.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 25351 OF 2015 Jyoti Parmar & anr.

... Applicants v/s Sunil Parmar ... Respondent Ms.Bhakti Deshpande i/by V.A.Navale for the applicants. Mr.Bhupesh Samant for the respondent.

CORAM: N.M. JAMDAR, J.

DATED : 15 MARCH 2016 P.C.:

Learned counsel for the Respondent points out that Applicant No.1, by way of this application seeks to transfer the Divorce Petition No.386 of 2013 filed in the Family Court at Surat, to the Family Court at Thane.

As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the Respondent, the High Court will not have power to transfer the proceedings from one State to another under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the Applicant will have to seek her remedies elsewhere. Learned counsel for the Applicants submitted that the matter may be referred for the mediation. It is pointed out

bsb 2 19.MCAst.25351.15.doc by learned counsel for the Respondent that, in the Family Court at Thane, the matter is already referred for mediation. In the circumstances, the miscellaneous civil application cannot be entertained and is rejected.

The ad-interim order granted earlier stands vacated. ( N. M. JAMDAR, J. )