Anil Kashinath Naik v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

: 1 :

2.wp.3540-17.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3540 OF 2017 Anil Kashinath Naik .....Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .... Respondents ----- Mr. G.S. Jadhav, Advocate i/b. R.D. Suryawanshi, for the Petitioner.

Ms. M.R. Tidke, APP for the Respondent-State. ----- CORAM : SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 15th JUNE, 2023 P.C. :

1.

Learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner has complied with the order of externment. The externment period is already over and the Petition has become infructuous.

2.

Considering this statement, the Petition is disposed of as having rendered infructuous.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) Deshmane(PS)