Mrs. Vanita Kumar Pagare And Another v. Mr. Kumar Ravji Pagare

Sr.No. 18 FCA 258.14 and cam 350.14 SSK

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 258 OF 2014 Sau Vanita Kumar Pagare and anr.

....Appellants.

versus Shri Kumar Ravji Pagare ....Respondent Mr. Raj J. Khade, advocate for the appellants. Mr. Girish Agrawal, advocate for the respondent. CORAM : RANJIT MORE & ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

DATED : 27th March, 2015.

P.C.:

Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2.

Admit.

(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.) Shubhada S Kadam 1/2

Sr.No. 18 FCA 258.14 and cam 350.14 SSK

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 350 OF 2014 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 258 OF 2014 Sau Vanita Kumar Pagare and anr.

....Applicants/ Appellants.

versus Shri Kumar Ravji Pagare ....Respondent Mr. Raj J. Khade, advocate for the applicant/appellants. Mr. Girish Agrawal, advocate for the respondent. CORAM : RANJIT MORE & ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

DATED : 27th March, 2015.

P.C.:

By separate order passed today, we have admitted the aforesaid appeal. In that view of the matter, the applicants are entitled to interim relief in terms of prayer clause (a) during the pendency of the appeal and the same is, accordingly, granted. The civil application stands disposed of.

(ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.) Shubhada S Kadam 2/2