← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/9521/2021disposed off

Anantrao Thopte Krishi Tantra Niketan Bhor Thr The Authorised Representative And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Government Pleader And ORS

2022-01-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin Jamdar,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar2 pages

rsk 1 26-aswp9521-2021.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO. 9521 OF 2021 Anantrao Thopte Krishi Tantra Niketan Bhor, through the authorized representative & Others ...

Petitioners.

V/s.

The State of Maharashtra, through Government Pleader & Others ...

Respondents.

Mr. Ameya V. Borwankar for the Petitioners.

Mrs. P. J. Gavhane, AGP for the Respondent-State. Ms. Rupali Vasaikar for Respondent No.3.

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND AMIT BORKAR, JJ.

DATE :

18 JANUARY 2022.

(Through Video Conferencing) P. C. :

Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners.

2.

The Petitioners, five in number, are independent institutions with no connection with each other, with different set of facts. They are seeking a direction to Respondent Nos.3 and 4 to allow them to start a three years full English Agriculture Polytechnic Diploma Course in their respective establishments. 3.

For this purpose the Respondents will have to examine by RAJESHWARI SUBODH KARVE Date:

2022.01.19 17:00:10 +0530 RAJESHWARI SUBODH KARVE

rsk 2 26-aswp9521-2021.doc the situation in each of these five establishments regarding the infrastructure, human resource etc, which would be different. Therefore, such a combined petition on behalf of all five independent institutions ought not to have been filed. The learned counsel for the Petitioners, accepts this position and states that independent petitions on behalf of each of the Petitioners would be filed.

4.

Petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the Petitioners to file separate petitions.

(AMIT BORKAR, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)