Shri. Chandrashekhar Sahebrao Dhamdhere v. Mrs. Archana Chandrashekhar Dhamdhere

1 / 2 10-CAM-278-16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.278 OF 2016 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL (ST) NO.25805 OF 2016 Chandrashekhar Sahebrao Dhamdhere .... Applicant versus Mrs.Archana Chandrashekhar Dhamdhere ... Respondent .......

• Mr.Vilas B. Tapkir, Advocate for the Applicant. • None for the Respondent.

CORAM : K. K. TATED & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : 29th JANUARY, 2018.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel Mr.Vilas Tapkir for the Applicant. 2.

The Advocate Mr.Tapkir submits that they have already served the Respondents. Statement is accepted. In spite of service, no one appeared on behalf of the Respondent when the matter was called out.

3.

This Application is preferred by husband for condonation of 140 days delay in filing the First Appeal, Nesarikar

2 / 2 10-CAM-278-16.odt challenging the Judgment and Decree dated 07/01/2016 passed by the Family Court at Pune, in P.A. No.494/2010. 4.

Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the Applicant and the averments made in Civil Application, we are satisfied that the Applicant has made out the case for allowing the Civil Application.

5.

Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b), which reads thus;

(A) (b) This Hon'ble Court be pleased to condone the delay of 140 days in filing of above said Family Court Appeal.

(B) Civil Application stands disposed of accordingly.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.)