Shri. Ramesh Dayaldas Tanwani And ORS. v. The Tahesildar Of Karveer And ORS.
DSS 1 p-507-508-cwp-9885-18 @9872-18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9885 OF 2018 Pravin P. Kalbar and ors.
...
Petitioners.
V/s.
The Tahesildar of Karveer and ors.
...
Respondents.
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 9872 OF 2018 Ramesh D. Tanwai and ors.
...
Petitioners.
V/s.
The Tahesildar of Karveer and ors.
...
Respondents.
AND WRIT PETITION NO. 11679 OF 2018 Amitkumar M. Gat and ors.
...
Petitioners.
V/s.
The Tahesildar of Karveer and ors.
...
Respondents.
APPEARANCE IN ALL MATTERS Mr.Manoj A. Patil for the Petitioners.
Mr. P.P. More, AGP for the Respondent No.1/ State. CORAM :
A.S. OKA AND M.S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE :
23rd OCTOBER 2018.
COMMON ORDER 1] Not on board. Taken on board.
2] Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned AGP for the 1st respondent.
3] According to the case of the petitioners, their names appear in Kabjedar column of 7 x 12 extracts in respect of the subject lands as of
DSS 2 p-507-508-cwp-9885-18 @9872-18.doc today. The apprehension of the petitioners is that, on the basis of the communication dated 12th June 2018 issued by the Tahasildar of Karveer, their names will be deleted from the revenue record and the names of the legal representatives of the original owner will be mutated. 4] We accept the statement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the names of the petitioners appear even today in Kabjedar column of 7 x 12 extracts in respect of the subject lands. In view of the said statement, it is obvious that the Authorities under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 cannot not delete the names of the petitioners from 7 x 12 extracts without giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners. Thus, action of deletion of the names of the petitioners, if any, shall not be taken on the basis of the impugned communication without giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioners.
5] With the above directions, the petitions are disposed of. 6] All contentions on merits are kept open.
(M. S. SONAK, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)