Vinod @ Vinayak Balasaheb Barve v. The State Of Maharashtra
by CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Date:
2022.12.21 10:50:39 +0530 CHITRA SANJAY SONAWANE Chitra Sonawane.
44-BA-2771-2022.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2771 OF 2022 Vinod @ Vinayak Balasaheb Barve ..... Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent.
WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4253/2022 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO.2771 OF 2022 Rahul Chandrakant Ighe ...
Intervener.
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:
Vinod @ Vinayak Balasaheb Barve ..... Applicant.
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ..... Respondent.
....
Mr Aniket Nikam i/b Amit Icham, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr M.G.Patil, APP for the State.
MR. Chetan Deshmukh, for the Intervenor.
....
CORAM : R. N. LADDHA, J.
DATE : 19 DECEMBER 2022.
Page No. 1 of 2 ____________________________________________ 19 December 2022
Chitra Sonawane.
44-BA-2771-2022.odt P.C.:
1.
Learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw the application with permission to renew his request if the trial is not progressed. Leave granted.
2.
The Application is disposed of as withdrawn.
3.
In view of the above, nothing survives in the interim application and the same is also disposed of. The learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. If the trial is not progressed then after six months, the applicant may review his request. (R. N. LADDHA, J.) Page No. 2 of 2 ____________________________________________ 19 December 2022