Shri. Prakash Hanumant Koli v. The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Solapur And ORS

skn 1 9306.11-wp.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9306 OF 2011 Shri Prakash Hanumant Koli.

...

Petitioner.

V/s.

The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Solapur and another.

...

Respondents None for the Petitioner.

Mr.A.I.Patel, Addl.GP for respondent No.2.

CORAM :

PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J.

AND N.M.JAMDAR, J.

DATE :

15 July 2019.

P.C. :

Notwithstanding there being no appearance on behalf of the petitioner, noting representations made to the Education Officer, Zilla Parishad, Solapur, on perusal of the averments in the writ petition to which there is no rebuttal, we dispose of the petition issuing necessary directions:

2.

The petitioner was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in Asha Marathi School, Solapur on 1 June 1995. The school is not only recognized but a fully aided school. The management forwarded petitioner's appointment as Assistant Teacher to the

skn 2 9306.11-wp.doc Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Solapur for approval. The approval was granted on 28 September 1995. 3.

The petitioner thereafter came to be appointed as an Assistant Teacher directly under the Zilla Parishad Primary School at Andhewari and was issued an appointment order on 19 March 1996 requiring the petitioner to submit technical resignation as Assistant Teacher of Asha Marathi School with effect from 20 March 1996. 4.

The limited issue which the petitioner seeks to urge in the writ petition is his service from 1 June 1995 till 20 March 1996 under the Asha Marathi School to be recognized for the purpose of provident fund and pensionary dues. The precise grievance is that in spite of repeated representations made drawing attention of the first respondent to the government resolutions collectively annexed as Annexure-D to the writ petition, no decision has been taken. 5.

The facts noted hereinabove require the writ petition to be disposed of directing the first respondent to decide the representations made by the petitioner in light of the government resolutions which he has referred to in the representations. 6.

Necessary decision to be taken within eight weeks and shall be implemented.

N.M.JAMDAR, J.

CHIEF JUSTICE