Maniklal Vaswani v. The State Of Maharashtra

(7) ABA 1621-16 Amk

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1621 OF 2016 Maniklal Vaswani .. Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. Subir Kumar for the Applicant.

Ms. Jyoti S. Lohokare, APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. K. J. Kadam, PSI, Santacruz Police Station present. CORAM : A.S. GADKARI, J.

DATE : 4 th APRIL, 2017.

P. C. :

1.

The applicant is apprehending arrest in C. R. No. 431 of 2016 registered with Santacruz Police Station, Mumbai dated 23.03.2016 under Sections 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2.

It is to be noted here that the aforestated crime is registered on 23.03.2016. During the course of preliminary enquiry, the applicant was served with a notice under Section 41(A) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Being apprehensive of the probable arrest, the applicant had approached the Sessions Court, Mumbai by way of Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1594 of 2016. As the said application was filed only on the basis of apprehension, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai was pleased to dispose of the said application without granting any relief. In the premise, the applicant has preferred the present application.

1/2

(7) ABA 1621-16 3.

Learned APP, on instructions from the Investigating Officer Shri Kadam who is present in Court, submitted that during the course of investigation the involvement of the applicant in the present crime has not been revealed and the police do not intend to implead the applicant as an accused in the present crime.

4.

In view of the above, the present application does not survive and is, accordingly, disposed of.

[A. S. GADKARI, J.] 2/2