← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/1929/2016others disposed off

Aashu @ Mayur Ashok Suryavanshi v. The State Of Maharashtra

2017-01-16Hon'Ble Justice Revati Mohite Dere3 pages

1/3 nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.1929 OF 2016 Aashu @Mayur Ashok Suryavanshi ... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr.Abhay Anturkar a/w Mr.Ajinkya Udane i/b Mr.Vikas Patil-Shirgaonkar, for the Applicant.

Ms.R.M.Gadhvi, APP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

DATE : 16th JANUARY, 2017 (IN CHAMBERS) P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

This is the second bail application preferred by the applicant. The first bail application of the applicant was rejected on merits by this Court (Coram: Revati Mohite Dere, J.) vide order dated 3rd March, 2015, in Criminal Bail Application No.1479 of 2014.

2/3 3.

Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is languishing in jail for more than 3 years and that the trial has not progressed till date.

4.

Perused the papers. There is no change in circumstance warranting consideration of the present bail application. A perusal of the roznama shows that till date five witnesses have been examined in the said case. Since the trial has commenced and five witnesses have already been examined, it is expected that the learned Judge shall decide the said case as expeditiously as possible.

5.

A perusal of the roznama also indicates that on several occassions accused were not produced by the jail authorities. Considering the aforesaid, the Police Commissioner, Thane City and Reserve Police Inspector, Police Head Quarter, Thane City to take effective steps to ensure that all the accused in the said case are produced on all the dates given by the learned Judge, in order to ensure that the case is not adjourned on account of the same.

3/3 6.

Considering the fact, that the trial has already commenced and that till date five witnesses have been examined, it would be appropriate to direct the learned Judge to expedite the trial and complete the same as expeditiously as possible.

7.

Accordingly, the Application is disposed of with the aforesaid direction.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.