← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7621/2006disposed off

Asmita Ramchandra Shinde v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2021-03-08Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.8362 OF 2006 Shalaka Vikas Doshi ...

Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7622 OF 2006 Akhil Ravindra Kshirsagar ...

Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7620 OF 2006 Vikrant Sushil Dhurandhar ...

Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7621 OF 2006 Asmita Ramchandra Shinde ...

Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7757 OF 2006 Divya Hiranand Tejuja & Anr.

...

Petitioners versus Maharashtra University of Health Sciences & Ors.

... Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1490 OF 2007 IN 1/3

WRIT PETITION NO.7757 OF 2006 Maharashtra University of Health Sciences ...

Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.7756 OF 2006 Sushanta Narayan Nankarni & Ors.

...

Petitioners versus Maharashtra University of Health Sciences & Ors.

... Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1489 OF 2007 IN WRIT PETITION NO.7756 OF 2006 Maharashtra University of Health Sciences ...

Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8317 OF 2006 Rani Dinkar Bhivasankar ...

Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.8359 OF 2006 Pooja Harish Vaidya ...

Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents .....

None for the Petitioner.

Mr.P.P.Kakade, GP a/w. Smt.R.A.Salunkhe, AGP for the Respondent/State.

.....

2/3

CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.

DATE :- MARCH 8, 2021 PC :

These Petitions have been notified as per the list of matters as received from the office of the learned Government Pleader to have become infructuous. As per the office notice dated 2nd March 2021, the Advocates for the petitioners/petitioners were called upon to give a praecipe in advance in case the petitions have not become infructuous. Such praecipe has not been received in regard to this petition. Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of as infructuous; however, with liberty to the petitioners to revive the petitions in case something survives.

Disposed of in the above terms. No costs.

The pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and stand disposed of.

(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) Digitally signed by Raju D. Gaikwad Date:

2021.03.09 19:06:56 +0530 Raju D.

Gaikwad 3/3