Sandeep Jhumberlal Pokharna v. The State Of Maharashtra
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 616 OF 2013 in CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 1512 OF 2010 Sandeep J. Pokharna.
..Applicant.
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Another.
..Respondents.
Mr. Sachin Chavan for the Applicant.
Mr. J. P. Yagnik, learned APP for the State.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
Date : April 28, 2015.
P. C. :
1.
Heard. For the reasons stated in paragraph 3 of the application, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Crim. Application No. 1512 of 2010 is restored to the file. Present Criminal Application stands disposed of. [SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] patilsr 1 / 2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 1512 OF 2010 Sandeep J. Pokharna.
..Applicant.
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Another.
..Respondents.
Mr. Sachin Chavan for the Applicant.
Mr. J. P. Yagnik, learned APP for the State.
Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.
Date : April 28, 2015.
P. C. :
1.
The learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant seeks oral leave to amend the application so as to annexe copy of the FIR. Leave granted. Necessary amendment be carried out within four weeks. Place for admission on 17th June 2015. [SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] patilsr 2 / 2