← Library
Bombay High CourtAPEAL/1084/2013appeal allowedreversed

Mohd Kasif Irshad Ali v. The State Of Maharashtra

2015-12-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.M. Thipsay3 pages

Tilak 1/3 APEAL-1084-13-220-15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1084 OF 2013 Mohd.Kasif Irshad Ali .. Appellant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.220 OF 2015 Rinku Rohatash Khan .. Appellant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent --- Mr.Amit Gharte, Advocate for the appellant in Criminal Appeal No.1084/13.

Mr.Satyavrat Joshi, Appointed Advocate for the appellant in Criminal Appeal No.220/15.

Mr.Deepak Thakre, APP for the Respondent State. --- CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.

DATED : 5th DECEMBER, 2015 --- P.C. :

For the reasons separately recorded, the Appeals are allowed.

OPERATIVE ORDER Appeals are allowed.

Tilak 2/3 APEAL-1084-13-220-15 The impugned judgment and order of conviction of the appellants is set aside.

The appellants are acquitted.

Each of them shall be set at liberty forthwith, unless required to be detained in some other case.

Fine, if paid be refunded to them respectively. A copy of this judgment be forwarded to the appellants in prison.

Appeals are disposed of.

(ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J)

Tilak 3/3 APEAL-1084-13-220-15 CERTIFICATE Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment/Order.