← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/248/2016disposed off

Rangnath Kisan Sable (Decd) Through Lrs. And ORS. v. State Of Maharashtra Through Tahsildar And ORS.

2017-02-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ranjit More.2 pages

Cao 248/16 and 49/16.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION No. 248 OF 2016 IN REVIEW PETITION No. 101 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4089 OF 2014 Rangnath Kisan Sabale Since deceased through legal heirs and representatives.

..Applicants.

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Others.

..Respondents.

Mr. Sanjay Shinde for the Applicants.

Mr. Sandeep Babar, AGP for the State.

Miss. Madhura Deshmukh i/b S. S. Kulkarni for Respondent No. 2 to 5 and 7.

Coram : RANJIT MORE, J.

Date : February 3, 2017.

P. C. :

1.

Petitioner No. 1 expired on 13th April 2016. The period of 90 days expired on 12th July 2016. The Petitioner thereafter filed this application on 19th September 2016. Thus, there is delay of 7 days in filing present application. In the interest of justice, delay deserves to be condoned. Hence, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Necessary amendments be carried out within two weeks from today. Civil Application stands disposed of. [RANJIT MORE, J.] patilsr 1 / 2

Cao 248/16 and 49/16.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION No. 49 OF 2016 IN REVIEW PETITION No. 101 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4089 OF 2014 Rangnath Kisan Sabale Since deceased through legal heirs and representatives.

..Applicants.

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Others.

..Respondents.

Mr. Sanjay Shinde for the Applicants.

Mr. Sandeep Babar, AGP for the State.

Miss. Madhura Deshmukh i/b S. S. Kulkarni for Respondent No. 2 to 5 and 7.

Coram : RANJIT MORE, J.

Date : February 3, 2017.

P. C. :

1.

This application is filed for bringing the legal heirs of deceased Respondent No. 6 on record. Respondent No. 6 expired on 16th April 2014 and present application is filed on 25th January 2016. Taking into consideration these dates, it is clear that there is delay of 1 year and 285 days. However, the Applicant has explained the same by making averments in paragraph 3 and 4. In these circumstances, application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (c). Necessary amendments be carried out within two weeks from today. Civil Application stands disposed of.

[RANJIT MORE, J.] patilsr 2 / 2