Sunil Vishwanath Gaikwad v. The State Of Maharashtra

jdk 1 5.crwp.3601.17.j.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITOIN NO. 3601 OF 2017 Sunil Vishwanath Gaikwad .. Petitioner Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent ....

Mr. Hitesh P. Shah Advocate for Petitioner Mr. Arfan Sait A.P.P. for State ....

CORAM : SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI AND M.S.KARNIK, JJ.

DATED : NOVEMBER 07, 2017 ORAL JUDGMENT [PER SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI,J. ]: Heard both sides. Rule. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith and matter is heard finally. The prayer of the petitioner in this petition is that his furlough appeal be decided expeditiously.

It is stated that the furlough appeal has already been decided. In this view of the matter, this petition is infructous and is disposed of as such. Rule is discharged. [ M.S.KARNIK, J.] [ SMT.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, J.] kandarkar