Vinayak Madhusudan Upadhyay v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

37. WP 4394-2021.doc by RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Date: 2022.12.07 11:13:38 +0530 RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4394 OF 2021 Vinayak Madhusudan Upadhyay

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr

...Respondents

Mr. Rishi Bhuta a/w Mr. Jatin Pore, Mr. Gaurav Suryawanshi i/b DSK Legal for the Petitioner.

Mr. J.P.Yagnik, A.P.P for the Respondent-State. Ms. Kajal Sarvaiya for the Respondent No.2.

CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & R. N. LADDHA, JJ.

DATE : 21 st NOVEMBER, 2022 P.C. :

1.

Learned Counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file an appropriate application seeking the petitioner's discharge from the said case. 2.

The petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed.

Wakodikar 1/2

37. WP 4394-2021.doc 3.

If an application seeking discharge is filed by the petitioner, the learned Judge to consider the said application on its own merits, in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the withdrawal of the aforesaid petition.

4.

All contentions of the parties, on merits, are kept open. R. N. LADDHA, J.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

Wakodikar 2/2