Trilokrao Shravanlal Ramtekkar v. Dyaneshwar Vittal Thonge And ANR

1 / 2 02-APEAL-366-13.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.366 OF 2013 Trilokrao Shravanlal Ramtekkar .... Appellant versus Dnyaneshwar Vitthal Thonge & Anr.

.... Respondents .......

• Mr.Sagar A. Joshi, Advocate for Appellant.

• Ms.Madhavi Ayyappam i/b. Talekar & Associates, Respondent No.1.

• Smt. A.A.Takalkar, APP for the State.

CORAM

: SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.

DATE : 18th AUGUST, 2021 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Learned counsel for the Appellant fairly submits that the view of the judgment of Hon'

ble Supreme Court in the case of Mallikarjun Kodagali (Dead) represented through Legal Representatives Vs State of Karnataka & Ors., as reported in (2019) 2 SCC 752, he does not press this Appeal. Nesarikar

2 / 2 02-APEAL-366-13.odt 3.

The Appeal, preferred by the Appellant i.e. father of the deceased bearing No.366 of 2013, is disposed of as withdrawn. However, learned counsel for the Appellant is permitted to assist the learned APP, in the Appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra.

(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)