Shiv Shankar G. Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

10-apl-1000-1001-1002.2018.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLN U/S 482 NO. 1000 OF 2018 Rekha Yadav w/o. Vishal Yadav and Ors.

...

Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...

Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLN U/S 482 NO. 1001 OF 2018 Subhashchandra R. Pal and Ors.

...

Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...

Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPLN U/S 482 NO. 1002 OF 2018 Shiv Shankar G. Yadav and Ors.

...

Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

...

Respondents Mr. Shriram Kulkarni for the applicants.

Mr. Rahul Kasbekar i/by Mr. Surel Shah for respondent no.2 in Cri. Appln No. 1000 of 2018 and Cri. Appln No. 1001 of 2018. Adv. Ashesha Chheda i/by Yugalraj Kandhari for respondent no.2 in Cri. Appln No. 1002 of 2018.

Mr.K.V. Saste, APP for the State.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & NITIN R. BORKAR, JJ.

DATE :

DECEMBER 12, 2019 nilegaonkar 1/2

10-apl-1000-1001-1002.2018.odt P.C.:

Offence has been registered because of dispute in two groups claiming to be the Managing Trustees of the Public Trust. The change report proceedings ultimately reached to this Court in First Appeal and in the First Appeal, compromise has been reached. The applicants and their group in Criminal Application No. 1000 of 2018 have walked out and the other group has entered the office. As a part of compromise, the parties have agreed to withdraw all Criminal matters and accordingly certain criminal matters have already been withdrawn. Accordingly the affidavit given by the complainant is taken on record. The parties are also present with their respective advocates. 2.

In view of these developments, as the parties have already acted upon the consent terms, we make the rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). The Criminal Applications are accordingly allowed and disposed of.

(NITIN R. BORKAR, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.) nilegaonkar 2/2