Smt. Angha Pramod Deshpande v. The Principal Dist. Judge, Nashik And ANR.

UMESH SHRINIWAS MALANI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION UMESH SHRINIWAS MALANI Date: 2022.06.15 18:07:37 +0530 WRIT PETITION NO. 14740 OF 2018 Ashok Shankarrao Thorat

...Petitioner

Versus

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5778 OF 2019 Anil Kisan More

...Petitioner

Versus

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 1068 OF 2019 Kishor Narayan Pawar

...Petitioner

Versus

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 12859 OF 2018 Sunil Dattatraya Wakade

...Petitioner

Versus

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11342 OF 2018 Prabhakar Ramchandra Nikam

...Petitioner

Versus

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 6951 OF 2022 Digambar Shantaram Kulkarni

...Petitioner

Versus

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11349 OF 2018 Smt. Angha Pramod Deshpande

...Petitioner

Versus

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11343 OF 2018 Smt. Rekha Sanjay Unhawne

...Petitioner

Versus

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11350 OF 2018 Smt. Shobha Subhir Gawande

...Petitioner

Versus

WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13335 OF 2018 Shashikant Ramchandra Bhagat

...Petitioner

Versus

***  Mr. Shantanu Chandratre i/by C.T. Chandratre for the Petitioners.

 Ms. Leena Patil for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. *** CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE : JUNE 14, 2022.

PER COURT :

1.

Not on board. Taken on production board.

2.

Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners submitted that Petitioners are occupying various positions in the District Judicial Services and were working under the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nashik. Learned Principal District and Sessions Judge by order dated 26th April, 2016 granted benefits under the scheme "Modified Assured Career Progress Scheme" to certain employees and the Petitioners were deprived of those benefits. It is further submitted by learned Counsel appearing for Petitioners that during the pendency of the Petitions certain identically circumstanced employees were granted benefits by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Nashik and the Petitioners are desirous of

putting their claim before the competent Authority with a prayer to grant similar treatment to the Petitioners as such, the Counsel for Petitioners prayed for withdrawal of the Petitions. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners further submitted that contentions raised in the Petitions may be kept open so that, in case, there is no positive decision in favour of the Petitioners, the Petitioners can avail appropriate legal remedies and disposal of the present Petitions may not come in the way of the Petitioners in future. 3.

Accordingly, at the request of learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners, the Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of as such. The contentions raised in the Petitions are kept open. (SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)