Ramesh Mansoor Thadershwar @ Ramesh Soni @ Ramesh Jhaveri v. The State Of Maharashtra
Anand
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.820 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.277 OF 2015 Ramesh Mansoor Thadeshwar alias .Applicant Ramesh Soni alias Ramesh Jhaveri v/s.
The State of Maharashtra .Respondent Mr.A.M.Saraogi, Advocate, for the Applicant Mrs.P.P.Shinde, APP, for the Respondent - State
CORAM
:
REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.
DATE :
23.09.2015 P.C.
.
Not on board. Taken on board.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent - State. 3.
This is yet another application preferred by the applicant seeking further extension of time of four weeks to furnish sureties or in the alternate to allow the
applicant to continue on cash bail. As far as the alternate prayer to allow the applicant to continue on cash bail is concerned, the said prayer is rejected, at the outset. It is pertinent to note that this Court (CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) vide order dated 10.06.2015 had enlarged the applicant on cash bail of Rs.1,00,000/-. The operative part of the said order reads thus :- "(i) The applicant herein shall be enlarged on cash bail of Rs.1 lakh (Rupees one lakh only) for a period of four weeks from the date of release. After four weeks the applicant shall comply with the order dated 21.04.2015."
4.
Thereafter, the applicant preferred an application, being Cri. Appln. No.606 of 2015 seeking extension of time to furnish surety. This Court (CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) vide order dated 29.07.2015 extended the time by three weeks to enable the applicant to furnish surety within the said period. Thereafter, the
applicant moved another application, being Cri. Appln. No.689 of 2015 seeking extension of time of four weeks to furnish surety. It is recorded in the said order dated 21.08.2015 that only by way of last chance, time is extended by a period of four weeks to enable the applicant to furnish surety.
5.
This is the third application of the applicant seeking further extension of time to furnish surety. It was made clear, on 21.08.2015 that only by way of last chance, time is extended by a period of four weeks to enable the applicant to furnish surety.
6.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that only by way of indulgence four weeks extension may be granted. He submits that in the event, the applicant is unable to furnish the surety, the applicant will surrender before
the appropriate Court. In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the applicant, only by way of indulgence, time is extended by a period of four weeks to enable the applicant to furnish surety and to comply with the earlier order dated 10.06.2015.
7.
The Application is allowed on the aforesaid terms and disposed of.
Parties to act on the authenticated copy of this order.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
CERTIFICATE Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Judgment/order.