Satish Namdeo Khutale v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/1 25-BA-3111-22.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3111 OF 2022 Mr. Satish Namdeo Khutale ...Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Paramhans S. Dixit i/b Mr. Shaibaz Khokhara, for the Applicant. Mr. P.H. Gaikwad, APP, for the State.

Mr. Lala Bhaujabeb Lonkar, PSI, Panvel City Police State, Navi Mumbai, present.

CORAM :

N.R. BORKAR, J.

DATE :

06.12.2022.

P.C. :

The learned counsel Mr. Paramhans S. Dixit for the applicant submits that the Advocate on record is in personal difficulty and seeks adjournment.

2.

The learned APP for the respondent/State on instructions submits that the trial has already commenced and the prosecution has already examined two witnesses. Considering the fact that the trial has already commenced, I am not inclined to entertain the present application.

3.

The application is rejected.

[N.R.BORKAR, J.] A. J. Vallakati 1/1