Vyankatesh Dhondo Kulkarni v. State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And ORS

1/2 4-cai-1-17.doc pdp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2017 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 32 OF 2006 Venkatesh Dhondo Kulkarni ..Applicant/ Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..Respondents Mr. Rajaram Deshmukh for Applicant/Petitioner. Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for Respondent Nos.5 and 6. Mr. A. A. Garge for Respondent No.7.

CORAM: PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, CJ. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.

OCTOBER 15, 2019.

P.C.

1.

The Petition filed in public interest was dismissed for non prosecution on 8th September, 2016 recording that if the Petitioner applies for restoration he would have to satisfy the Court that the cause of action subsists.

2.

Seeking restoration of the PIL when asked whether cause of action subsists, learned Counsel for the Petitioner frankly

2/2 4-cai-1-17.doc concedes that none subsists for the reason the contract in question has been completed and even the concessionare period is over. 3.

The Civil Application is accordingly dismissed. SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. CHIEF JUSTICE Digitally signed by Pravin D.

Pandit Date:

2019.10.16 10:02:13 +0530 Pravin D.

Pandit