Sandeep Sadashiv Jadhav v. Rohini Sandeep Jadhav And ORS

Sr.No.901 WP 3335.16 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3335 OF 2016 Shri Sandeep Sadashiv Jadhav ..Petitioner

Versus

Rohini Sandeep Jadhav and ors.

..Respondents Mr. V. B. Shivarkar, advocate for the petitioner. Mr. U. B. Nighot, advocate for respondent Nos. 1 to 6. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for the State.

CORAM : RANJIT MORE, DR. SHALINI PHANSALKARJOSHI, J J.

DATE : 29th NOVEMBER, 2016.

P. C. :

Heard learned counsel and learned APP appearing for the respective parties.

2.

Mr. Yagnik, learned APP, having taken instructions, stated that the petitioner's complaint was enquired into and a conclusion is arrived at that the allegations in the complaint disclose commission of non-cognizable offence. In support of his statement, he has placed on record the report dated 28th November, 2016 of the Assistant Commissioner of Police, Aale Phata Police Station. 3.

In the above circumstances, we are not inclined to entertain the petition, especially when the petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy of approaching a magistrate by way of private complaint. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI) [RANJIT MORE, J.] Shubhada S Kadam 1/1