Anil Shivaji Pawar v. State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And ORS.

skn 1 22-WP-12040.2018.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE WRIT PETITION NO. 12040 OF 2018 Anil Shivaji Pawar.

...

Petitioner.

V/s.

State of Maharashtra and others.

...

Respondents.

Mr.R.K.Mendadkar for the Petitioner.

Ms.Rupali Shinde, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. SANJAY KASHINATH NANOSKAR CORAM :

NITIN JAMDAR, AND M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.

SANJAY KASHINATH NANOSKAR Date: 2024.04.29 19:27:33 +0530 DATE :

25 April 2024.

P.C. :

The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that Respondent Nos.3 and 4- employers are served. None appears for them.

2.

The learned AGP states that the pending caste claim of the Petitioner would be decided within a period of eight weeks. The learned AGP states that this statement is made on the basis of the instructions given by Mr.Manohar Chandu Memane, Research Officer.

skn 2 22-WP-12040.2018.doc 3.

Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of accepting the aforesaid statement.

4.

The protection granted by way of ad-interim order to continue till the disposal of the caste claim as above and for a period of four weeks thereafter, if the decision is adverse to the Petitioner. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)