Sunita Shukla v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

1/2 37.669.14 appp

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 669 OF 2014 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 133 OF 2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge's orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ None for the applicant Ms. G. P. Mulekar APP for the State.

CORAM :

SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV.

DATED :

AUGUST 25, 2015.

P.C. :

None present for the applicant. This is an application seeking restoration of application which was dismissed for want of prosecution vide order dated 01/09/2014. On 25/08/2014, learned counsel for the applicant had filed a leave note for the period 01/09/2014 to 05/09/2014. Hence, learned counsel for the applicant, could not remain present on 01/09/2014 i.e. the date on which the

2/2 37.669.14 appp application was dismissed for want of prosecution.

2) Taking into consideration the leave note filed by the learned counsel, application seeking restoration deserves to be allowed.

3) Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause 'A'. Application stands disposed of.

4) Criminal Application No. 133 of 2014 is restored to its original status and be listed for admission in due course.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.) ism