Shantanu Narayan Rooj v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

1 5) wp3355-16.doc SAS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3355 OF 2016 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3356 OF 2016 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3357 OF 2016 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3358 OF 2016 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3359 OF 2016 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3360 OF 2016 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3361 OF 2016 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3362 OF 2016 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3363 OF 2016 Shantanu Narayan Rooj ..Petitioner.

V/s.

State of Maharashtra & Anr.

..Respondents.

Mr.Prasad Kumar Das for the petitioner in all matters. Mrs.S.S. Kaushik, APP for respondent-State in all matters. Mr.Shavez Mukri i/b. India Law for respondent No.2 in all matters. CORAM: NITIN W.SAMBRE, J.

DATE : MARCH 6, 2018

2 5) wp3355-16.doc P.C.:- Heard the respective parties.

2.

It is not in dispute that the issue raised in the present petitions are covered by the judgment of this Court dated October 12, 2015 delivered in Criminal Writ Petition No.348 of 2014 with other connected matters. Only an additional submission made by the learned counsel for the respondent-complainant, that Form No.32 under the Companies Act whereby the resignation of the director is required to be notified was done subsequent to filing of complaint even if the reason of acceptance of resignation is prior in point of time.

3.

So far as this submission is concerned, it is not in dispute that already in the Company Director's Report for the year 2012-13, the present petitioner was shown to have resigned, and no more continues to be the director of the company. 4.

In view thereof, in my opinion, the present petitions can be disposed of in terms of order dated October 12, 2015 passed in Criminal Writ Petition No.348 of 2014 with other connected matters.

(NITIN W.SAMBRE, J.)