Mohammad Aslam Ashraf Qureshi v. Mr. Shashi Kumar Sharma

skn 1/1 2988.15-caw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2988 OF 2015 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 1918 OF 2014 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's orders or directions & Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge's orders ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Ms.Samina Mirza i/b. Rahul Tahkur for applicant in CA. Madan Singh Khati for the petitioner.

N.R.Bubna for respondent No.1.

Mrs.M.P.Thakur, AGP for respondent No.2.

Ms.Kiran Bagalia for respondent No.3.

CORAM :

A.S. OKA AND C.V.BHADANG, JJ DATED :

14th January 2016.

P.C.:

Heard learned counsel for the applicant. The application is opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner. We find that in the writ petition a relief has been claimed in respect of the structures on the land claimed by the applicant. Moreover, the prayer of the applicant for regularization is being considered by the third respondent- MMRDA as disclosed in the affidavit filed today. Therefore, the applicant is a proper party to the writ petition. Accordingly, application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

(C.V. BHADANG, J) (A.S.OKA, J)