The State Of Maharashtra And ORS v. Sunil Gangadhar Karve

1 of 2 APPW.424.2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.424 OF 2015 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.721 OF 2014

1. The State of Maharashtra,

2. The Commissioner of Police, Mumbai.

3. The Joint Commissioner of Police, Mumbai.

4. The Additional Commissioner of Police, Mumbai.

5. The Senior Inspector of Police, EOW, Mumbai.

6. The Senior Inspector of Police, Bandra.

7. CBI, EOW, Mumbai.

8. Chhagan Chandrakant Bhujbal, Mumbai,

9. Pankaj Chhagan Bhujbal, Mumbai,

10. Sameer Magan Bhujbal, Mumbai,

11. Mrs.Meena Chhagan Bhujbal, Mumbai,

12. Vishakha Bhujbal, Mumbai,

13. Shefali Bhujbal, Mumbai.

Applicants versus Sunil Gangadhar Karve Respondent Mr.K.V.Saste, APP, for Applicants-State.

Mr.Rizwan Merchant with Mr.Ranjeet M. Pawar, Mr.Suraj P. Nangare for Petitioner.

Mr.J.R.Solanki for CBI.

Mr.R.B.Mokashi, Karan Vyas, S.K.Krishnan i/by Sajal Yadav for Applicant nos.8 to 13.

CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL AND PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

DATE :

2nd August 2016 PC :

1.

Heard. Learned APP appearing for the Applicants-State submits that delay has occurred in filing affidavit-in-reply. By an

2 of 2 APPW.424.2015 order dated 14 August 2015, Applicant nos.1 to 6 herein were directed to file reply affidavits within four weeks. Affidavit-in-reply has been filed today.

2.

We find that present application was filed by State on 22 September 2015 seeking extension of four weeks to comply with the order dated 14 August 2015. The explanation offered for delay is not convincing. We, however, take on record affidavit-in-reply, subject to payment of costs of Rs.2,000/- within two weeks from today.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (NARESH H. PATIL, J.) MST