← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/9578/2015dismissed

Rakesh Chandanmal Jain v. Manisha Rakesh Jain

2018-07-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice K. K. Sonawane2 pages

17 wp9578-18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9578 OF 2015 Shevanti Ladkya Bamne and Ors.

.. Petitioners V/s.

Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and Ors.

.. Respondent Mr.V.V.Salunke for the petitioner

CORAM:

K.K. TATED, J DATED :

JANUARY 15, 2019 P.C. :

Heard.

By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the Petitioner original plaintiff challenges the order dated 04.08.2017 passed by 8th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Thane below Exhibit- 47 in Regular Civil Suit No. 667 of 203 rejecting Petitioner original plaintiff's Application for amendment of pleading as per Order VI Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Applicant and particularly paragraph 8 of the impugned order, following order is passed:

Mohite 1/2

17 wp9578-18.doc a) Registry is directed to issue notice before admission to the Respondents, returnable on 8.03.2019.

b) In addition to usual mode of service, Petitioner is permitted to serve Respondents along with entire proceedings by private notice either by registered post A.D. and/or by hand delivery and file Affidavit of Service to that effect on or before 20.03.2019. c) At present, no ad-interim relief.

d) Stand over to 08.03.2019.

(K.K. TATED, J.) Mohite 2/2