Pawan Kumar Sarju Yadav v. The State Of Maharashtra

ba.2144.17.901.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2144 OF 2017 Pawan Kumar Sarju Yadav ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Laxmikant Shrimangale for the Applicant Mr. A. A. Palkar, A.P.P for the Respondent-State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

TUESDAY, 3 rd APRIL, 2018 P.C. :

1.

It is informed that charge has been framed in the said case. As this Court is inclined to expedite the trial, learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw this application with liberty to file an appropriate application, if the trial does not conclude within a specified time. 2.

Accordingly, the application is disposed of as withdrawn. 3.

Having regard to the facts of this case, the learned Judge to conclude the case as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within two months from the date of receipt of this order. SQ Pathan 1/2

ba.2144.17.901.doc 4.

If, for no fault of the applicant, the trial does not conclude within the stipulated period, the applicant is at liberty to file a fresh application, which will be considered on its own merits. 5.

The application is disposed of on the aforesaid terms. 6.

All concerned to act on the authenticated copy of this order. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

SQ Pathan 2/2