Rajendra Bapurao Nikam v. The State Of Maharashtra

ba.1924.15.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1924 OF 2015 Rajendra Bapurao Nikam ...Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Viral Rathod I/b Mr. H. E. Palwe for the Applicant Mr. Y. M. Nakhwa, A.P.P for the Respondent-State CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

MONDAY, 25 th APRIL, 2016 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned A.P.P for the State.

2.

Learned Counsel for the applicant, at the outset, submits that the trial of the applicant has commenced. He submits that three witnesses have been examined so far, and six more witnesses are left to be examined. 3.

In view of the same, without going into the merits, since the trial has commenced, I am not inclined to consider the application on merits. Accordingly, the application is rejected. SQ Pathan 1/2

ba.1924.15.doc 4.

Since the trial has already commenced, it is expected that the same will be disposed of, as expeditiously as possible. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

SQ Pathan 2/2