Mr. Jitendra Kalidas Pathak v. State Of Maharashtra Through Principal Secretary School, And ORS.

10-ASRPW-98-2023.DOC Shephali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 98 OF 2023 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 314 OF 2018 Jitendra Kalidas Pathak

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Ors

...Respondents

Mr Mandar Limaye, for the Petitioner.

Mr NC Walimbe, Addl. GP, with TJ Kapre, AGP, for the Respondent-State.

CORAM

G.S. Patel & Neela Gokhale, JJ.

DATED:

22nd March 2024 PC:- SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2024.03.26 10:19:45 +0530 1.

Some authority not having been considered in a manner to the satisfaction of the Review Petitioner is not a ground for review. 2.

In our view, there is no error apparent on the face of the record. It is clear that our judgment on the review relies on and follows the decision of the Supreme Court in M Ramanatha Pillai v The State of Kerala & Anr.1 The submission that there is a another (1973) 2 SCC 650.

22nd March 2024

10-ASRPW-98-2023.DOC judgment of this Court that distinguishes the High Court decision in Satish Ganpatrao Patil & Ors v State of Maharashtra & Ors2 (which we considered) will make no difference.

3.

There is no substance in the Review Petition. 4.

The Review Petition is dismissed.

(Neela Gokhale, J) (G. S. Patel, J) MANU/MH/0547/2015.

22nd March 2024